Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Equivalence Principle



On Mon, 16 Feb 1998, A. R. Marlow wrote:

Apropos the continuing appeal to the equivalence principle to try to
justify the inclusion of fictitious forces in physics, the clear and
cogent analysis of the principle by Edward A. Desloge (Nonequivalence of a
uniformly accelerating reference frame and a frame at rest in a uniform
gravitational field, Am. J. Phys., 57, 12, December, 1989, Pp. 1121 -
1125) should definitely be read by anyone interested in the issue.
...
The new emphasis in the paper is on the fact that *uniform* gravitational
fields both exist (contrary to claims made sometimes) and can be
distinguished from acceleration in a field free space.

I recall reading and being disturbed by this paper when it first
appeared. Despite the author's very specific conclusions, I still
can't understand on physical grounds how one could possibly
distinguish between a uniform gravitational field and uniform
acceleration. Doesn't it seem simply a matter of definition that
any observation that would contradict the hypothesis that one
moves with uniform acceleration through a flat space would equally
contradict the hypothesis that space is filled with a uniform
gravitational field? Unfortunately, I am far too much of a
dilettante in these matters to completely follow the exposition,
much less, to find errors in it. In the end, with regret, I
simply filed the paper away and hoped for the "Comment on ..."
follow up that never appeared. So, now may be an auspicious time
to get the answers I should have sought back then.

I can't help but think that the distinctions the author makes must
ultimately be nothing more than nonphysical artifacts of using
different definitions for the coordinates in each case or
something similar. Can any other impartial observer (Paul?,
David? ...) confirm for me the validity of Desloge's analysis and,
if so, possibly give me a way of understanding, on more conceptual
grounds, how one might understand the distinction between uniform
gravity and uniform acceleration?

John
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A. John Mallinckrodt http://www.intranet.csupomona.edu/~ajm
Professor of Physics mailto:ajmallinckro@csupomona.edu
Physics Department voice:909-869-4054
Cal Poly Pomona fax:909-869-5090
Pomona, CA 91768-4031 office:Building 8, Room 223