Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of November, 1997
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: Sound and Hearing Workshop
,
10/31/1997 23:47, herbgottlieb
Query about solar azimuth formula
,
11/01/1997 05:40, Margaret Mary Mazzolini
vertical fall
,
11/01/1997 06:55, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Fuel Cells
,
11/01/1997 09:08, David Bowman
Re: A Parent's Day gem
,
11/01/1997 11:29, David Bowman
Re: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/01/1997 12:40, Jim Pengra
Re: Fuel Cells
,
11/01/1997 13:17, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: vertical fall
,
11/01/1997 13:23, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: vertical fall
,
11/01/1997 14:42, brian whatcott
Re: vertical fall
,
11/01/1997 14:49, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: RE: Models, etc.
,
11/01/1997 15:29, PPARKER
Sirius
,
11/01/1997 19:24, Mark Sylvester
Re: Sirius
,
11/01/1997 21:35, Tom McCarthy
Help with bob!
,
11/01/1997 21:50, Tom McCarthy
physics lab
,
11/01/1997 23:00, Rick Stine
Re: Help with bob!
,
11/02/1997 00:23, Hugh Haskell
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 01:36, Hugh Haskell
RE: Help with bob!
,
11/02/1997 02:31, Brian Oliver
Re: Help with bob!
,
11/02/1997 07:04, David Bowman
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 07:45, Lowell Herr
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 07:54, Homer B. James
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 10:04, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 10:06, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 14:26, George Spagna
Re: A Parent's Day gem
,
11/02/1997 14:39, John Mallinckrodt
Re: vertical fall
,
11/02/1997 14:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: physics lab
,
11/02/1997 14:57, hake
Sound and Hearing Workshop
,
11/02/1997 15:16, gerald hart
Re: buoyant cannon balls
,
11/02/1997 15:37, Timothy J. Folkerts
Re: A Parents' Day gem
,
11/02/1997 16:48, Hugh Haskell
Re: Gedankening
,
11/02/1997 17:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: Demo/Hands on...'Scale'
,
11/02/1997 17:49, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Gedankening
,
11/02/1997 17:58, Hugh Haskell
RE: Gedankening
,
11/02/1997 18:12, Hugh Haskell
Re: A Parents' Day gem
,
11/02/1997 18:38, Hugh Haskell
RE: Models, etc.
,
11/02/1997 19:36, Hugh Haskell
Re: The parents' day Gem
,
11/02/1997 19:41, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Buoyant Bullets
,
11/02/1997 19:52, Hugh Haskell
Re: Buoyant Bullets
,
11/02/1997 20:05, Hugh Haskell
Re: A Parents' Day gem
,
11/02/1997 22:04, Robert Mathieson
RE: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/02/1997 23:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: buoyant cannon balls
,
11/02/1997 23:52, brian whatcott
Re: Sound and Hearing Workshop
,
11/03/1997 00:09, brian whatcott
Re: A Parents' Day gem
,
11/03/1997 00:26, brian whatcott
Re: Sirius
,
11/03/1997 01:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: buoyant cannon balls
,
11/03/1997 01:36, Leigh Palmer
Re: optics
,
11/03/1997 02:50, Allen Shotwell
Re: physics lab
,
11/03/1997 05:53, Homer B. James
Re: Sirius
,
11/03/1997 08:17, Mark Sylvester
Re: buoyant cannon balls
,
11/03/1997 09:05, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
dressing up a problem
,
11/03/1997 09:13, Michael Moloney
optics
,
11/03/1997 10:02, George Marrash
Re: Query about solar azimuth formula
,
11/03/1997 10:05, Paul Camp
NISE Fellow Opportunities
,
11/03/1997 10:09, Warren Hein
Re: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/03/1997 10:19, Roger Haar
Re: optics
,
11/03/1997 10:30, James S. Marsh
Re: buoyant bullets.
,
11/03/1997 10:45, Richard W. Tarara
Re: dressing up a problem
,
11/03/1997 11:26, Joseph Bellina
Re: optics
,
11/03/1997 11:54, SCIAMANDA
Position Announcement
,
11/03/1997 11:56, Laurent Hodges
Re: optics
,
11/03/1997 12:05, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: buoyant bullets.
,
11/03/1997 12:34, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A Parents' Day gem
,
11/03/1997 12:43, Larry Smith
Re: buoyant bullets.
,
11/03/1997 12:58, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Sound and Hearing Workshop
,
11/03/1997 12:59, Beth Thacker
RE: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/03/1997 13:07, brian whatcott
Re: buoyant cannon balls
,
11/03/1997 13:11, brian whatcott
Re: dressing up a problem
,
11/03/1997 13:18, brian whatcott
Re: dressing up a problem - forgot the mass !
,
11/03/1997 14:26, Michael Moloney
Re: optics
,
11/03/1997 14:27, Gary Karshner
Re: Models, etc.
,
11/03/1997 15:51, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: buoyant bullets.
,
11/03/1997 18:43, John Mallinckrodt
Re: dressing up a problem
,
11/03/1997 19:16, John Mallinckrodt
RE: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/03/1997 19:51, Brian J. Oliver
RE: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/03/1997 21:14, brian whatcott
Re: optics
,
11/03/1997 21:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Microwave Optics Experiments
,
11/03/1997 22:34, Stanley A Dodds
Re: Choir acoustics
,
11/03/1997 23:11, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Query about solar azimuth formula
,
11/03/1997 23:14, brian whatcott
Re: buoyant bullets.
,
11/04/1997 07:56, Richard W. Tarara
Re: buoyant bullets.
,
11/04/1997 08:58, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Spring Problem Revisited One Last Time
,
11/04/1997 09:09, J Kiefer
Re: optics
,
11/04/1997 09:10, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Spring Problem Revisited One Last Time
,
11/04/1997 10:28, J Kiefer
optics
,
11/04/1997 11:03, James S. Marsh
Re: dressing up a problem
,
11/04/1997 12:03, Chuck Britton
Spring Problem Revisited One Last Time
,
11/04/1997 12:40, SSMOTHERMAN
Re: dressing up a problem
,
11/04/1997 13:16, Michael Moloney
Re: Spring Problem Revisited One Last Time
,
11/04/1997 14:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: Old guitar strings
,
11/04/1997 15:37, Thomas L Wayburn
spring
,
11/04/1997 15:55, SMTP23
Re: Old guitar strings
,
11/04/1997 16:56, brian whatcott
Sping Problem
,
11/04/1997 19:02, A. R. Marlow
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/04/1997 20:28, brian whatcott
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/04/1997 20:53, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Sound and Hearing Workshop
,
11/04/1997 22:04, Joe Darling
Double messages solution?
,
11/05/1997 00:57, dolen freeouf
Re: Old guitar strings
,
11/05/1997 04:40, Timothy J. Folkerts
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/05/1997 10:19, Jim Goff
Re: Old guitar strings
,
11/05/1997 10:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: RE: Models, etc.
,
11/05/1997 11:48, PPARKER
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/05/1997 11:49, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/05/1997 11:53, Richard W. Tarara
piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/05/1997 13:12, Steve Luzader
Re: Piano tuning
,
11/05/1997 13:51, Paul Zitzewitz
Re: Models, etc.
,
11/05/1997 13:57, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Higher order derivatives in elasticity.
,
11/05/1997 13:57, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/05/1997 14:03, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Old guitar strings
,
11/05/1997 14:15, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Piano tuning
,
11/05/1997 14:28, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/05/1997 14:44, herbgottlieb
Re: Old guitar strings
,
11/05/1997 14:48, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Piano tuning
,
11/05/1997 14:54, James S. Marsh
Re: Models, etc./Higher derivatives
,
11/05/1997 15:22, David Bowman
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/05/1997 15:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Models, etc.
,
11/05/1997 15:59, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Piano tuning
,
11/05/1997 16:12, Jim Riley
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/05/1997 16:25, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Piano tuning
,
11/05/1997 17:31, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/05/1997 18:42, brian whatcott
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/05/1997 19:31, herbgottlieb
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/05/1997 20:14, Jim Diamond
bullets falling right
,
11/05/1997 22:04, Tim Burgess
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/05/1997 22:55, Hugh Haskell
Re: Piano tuning
,
11/05/1997 22:57, Hugh Haskell
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/06/1997 00:03, David Dockstader
What should we be teaching?
,
11/06/1997 00:05, Hugh Haskell
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/06/1997 00:14, David Dockstader
Re: bullets falling right
,
11/06/1997 00:58, David Dockstader
"Science"
,
11/06/1997 01:16, Richard H. Hodson
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/06/1997 04:26, Timothy J. Folkerts
Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 06:38, Timothy J. Folkerts
Physics
,
11/06/1997 07:45, James Harris
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 08:31, Martha Takats
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/06/1997 08:44, brian whatcott
Re: piano tuning etc.
,
11/06/1997 09:38, Timothy J. Folkerts
Re: bullets falling right
,
11/06/1997 09:52, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: optics
,
11/06/1997 10:00, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/06/1997 10:17, Clarence Bennett
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 12:27, SCIAMANDA
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 12:33, George Spagna
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 12:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: piano tuning etc.
,
11/06/1997 12:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 12:47, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 12:47, DSCHROEDER
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 12:52, roger haar
Real World
,
11/06/1997 12:58, Emilio O. Roxin
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/06/1997 13:24, John C. Park
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 13:56, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Real world
,
11/06/1997 13:57, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/06/1997 14:54, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 15:29, SCIAMANDA
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/06/1997 15:31, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Real World
,
11/06/1997 15:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/06/1997 15:43, SANDINT
Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/06/1997 15:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: Real World
,
11/06/1997 16:16, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/06/1997 16:21, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/06/1997 16:51, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 17:10, Jim Green
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 18:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: Real World
,
11/06/1997 18:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Old guitar strings--actually Leigh's comments
,
11/06/1997 18:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/06/1997 22:54, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 01:02, Leigh Palmer
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 02:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 04:48, Martha Takats
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/07/1997 07:37, msantos
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/07/1997 08:42, David Dockstader
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/07/1997 09:12, kyle forinash
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 09:16, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 09:45, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 09:50, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 11:38, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 12:54, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Query about solar azimuth formula
,
11/07/1997 14:26, Paul Camp
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 14:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 16:42, Rauber, Joel Phys
WSJ article 11/7/97-dimples on golfballs
,
11/07/1997 16:44, Keith Tipton
Al Bartlett on growth
,
11/07/1997 17:00, George Spagna
Re: Query about solar azimuth formula
,
11/07/1997 17:27, brian whatcott
Re: WSJ article 11/7/97-dimples on golfballs
,
11/07/1997 18:04, Stanley A Dodds
Re: Al Bartlett on growth
,
11/07/1997 18:31, hake
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 21:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Work-Energy or Work-Kinetic Energy??
,
11/07/1997 23:57, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Al Bartlett on growth
,
11/08/1997 10:30, Thomas L Wayburn
PHYSICS TENURE TRACK FACULT
,
11/08/1997 12:48, Jim Peters
Re: Al Bartlett on growth
,
11/08/1997 14:16, brian whatcott
Re: Al Bartlett on growth
,
11/08/1997 15:40, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Query about solar azimuth formula
,
11/08/1997 15:59, Paul Camp
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/08/1997 17:57, kifer/belk
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/08/1997 22:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: Vertical fall. A paradox?
,
11/09/1997 07:42, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/09/1997 09:28, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/09/1997 09:43, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/09/1997 10:17, Michael N. Monce
Re: Vertical fall. A paradox?
,
11/09/1997 13:27, John Mallinckrodt
misconceptions seminar site
,
11/09/1997 22:02, William Beaty
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/09/1997 22:17, Tim Burgess
The construction of myths
,
11/09/1997 22:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: Vertical fall. A paradox?
,
11/09/1997 23:56, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/10/1997 01:10, Hugh Haskell
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/10/1997 01:19, Hugh Haskell
Re: Vertical fall. A paradox?
,
11/10/1997 09:19, kyle forinash
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/10/1997 09:30, kyle forinash
Tarski (complete and consistent?)
,
11/10/1997 09:37, Chuck Britton
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/10/1997 10:04, Donald E. Simanek
Re: PHYS-L digest 582
,
11/10/1997 11:16, lhodges
Re: Tarski (complete and consistent?)
,
11/10/1997 12:37, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Tarski (complete and consistent?)
,
11/10/1997 13:12, msantos
Re: Tarski (complete and consistent?)
,
11/10/1997 16:17, Chuck Britton
FrameMaker Info.
,
11/10/1997 17:56, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: FrameMaker Info.
,
11/10/1997 18:26, PHYS010
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/10/1997 19:20, Lynn Aldrich
Re: Vertical fall. Aparadox?
,
11/10/1997 22:02, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/10/1997 22:06, Hugh Haskell
Re: FrameMaker Info.
,
11/10/1997 22:15, Hugh Haskell
Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/11/1997 00:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/11/1997 08:43, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: FrameMaker Info.
,
11/11/1997 10:27, Chuck Britton
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/11/1997 17:22, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/11/1997 19:23, herbgottlieb
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/11/1997 19:54, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/11/1997 19:58, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 00:29, David Dockstader
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 00:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 00:57, David Dockstader
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of ph
,
11/12/1997 04:07, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers
,
11/12/1997 05:35, Margaret Mazzolini
Hardness/restitution
,
11/12/1997 07:13, D Ismaël Youssouf
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 07:28, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/12/1997 07:40, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 08:39, John C. Park
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/12/1997 09:08, Michael N. Monce
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 09:15, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/12/1997 09:49, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 09:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers
,
11/12/1997 09:58, Paul Camp
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/12/1997 10:12, Gary Karshner
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers
,
11/12/1997 11:18, Paul Camp
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 11:20, George Spagna
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 11:21, SCIAMANDA
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers
,
11/12/1997 11:23, George Spagna
Re: Is compenence in physics ...
,
11/12/1997 12:09, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/12/1997 12:28, herbgottlieb
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/12/1997 12:50, herbgottlieb
Re: Tarski (complete and consistent?)
,
11/12/1997 13:31, PPARKER
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 13:36, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 14:40, SCIAMANDA
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 15:26, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 16:25, SCIAMANDA
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/12/1997 20:01, Jim Diamond
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/12/1997 20:18, John Mallinckrodt
oops
,
11/12/1997 21:10, Jim Diamond
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of
,
11/13/1997 06:18, John C. Park
Re: Sans Work, part I
,
11/13/1997 07:33, Eugene P. Mosca
remove
,
11/13/1997 09:49, john
Forces
,
11/13/1997 10:36, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/13/1997 11:47, herbgottlieb
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 12:12, James W. Wheeler
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/13/1997 12:26, SCIAMANDA
Re: Is competence in physics as a requirement for teachers of physics?
,
11/13/1997 12:41, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 12:53, DSCHROEDER
Re: forces
,
11/13/1997 13:04, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 14:20, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 14:42, Jim Green
Strange students question...
,
11/13/1997 14:43, crvhs_dks
Re: forces
,
11/13/1997 15:06, DSCHROEDER
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 15:14, DSCHROEDER
Re: Strange students question...
,
11/13/1997 16:51, Doug Craigen
Re: Sans Work, part 1 (Long and wordy)
,
11/13/1997 17:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 17:47, Leigh Palmer
Another student question
,
11/13/1997 17:47, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: forces
,
11/13/1997 18:05, Leigh Palmer
Re: Another student question
,
11/13/1997 18:56, brian whatcott
Re: Forces
,
11/13/1997 18:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: Another student question
,
11/13/1997 19:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: Another student question
,
11/13/1997 19:09, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Another student question
,
11/13/1997 20:17, Tom McCarthy
Re: Senza Lavoro part 2, Long & wordy
,
11/13/1997 22:12, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Senza Lavoro part 2, Long & wordy
,
11/13/1997 22:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Senza Lavoro part 2, Long & wordy
,
11/13/1997 23:52, Bob Sciamanda
Re: oops
,
11/14/1997 06:10, George Panagiotakopoulos
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 06:14, Martha Takats
Re: Senza Lavoro part 2, Long & wordy
,
11/14/1997 08:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Forces
,
11/14/1997 08:25, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Senza Lavoro part 2, Long & wordy
,
11/14/1997 08:48, brian whatcott
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 08:50, Joseph Bellina
Re: Strange students question...
,
11/14/1997 08:59, Maurice Barnhill
Bohr Theory
,
11/14/1997 09:35, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Senza Lavoro part 2, Long & wordy
,
11/14/1997 09:46, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 10:03, James W. Wheeler
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 10:36, Paul Camp
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 10:58, Jim Riley
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 11:55, Michael N. Monce
vortices in Kundt's tube
,
11/14/1997 16:42, Brian J. Oliver
RE Another student question
,
11/14/1997 17:57, David Abineri
Re: Another student question
,
11/14/1997 18:23, PHYS010
Re: Another student question/color
,
11/14/1997 20:40, Vern Lindberg
Re: forces
,
11/14/1997 22:46, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Ohne die Arbeit, part 3 (Long & wordy)
,
11/15/1997 05:03, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Teaching Eval's.
,
11/15/1997 06:35, kifer/belk
RE: Forces
,
11/15/1997 12:25, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Ohne die Arbeit, part 3 (Long & wordy)
,
11/15/1997 14:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Forces
,
11/15/1997 14:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: forces
,
11/15/1997 16:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: forces
,
11/15/1997 17:47, John Mallinckrodt
Forces:
,
11/15/1997 21:58, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Ohne die Arbeit, part 3 (Long & wordy)
,
11/16/1997 00:05, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Forces:
,
11/16/1997 08:44, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Forces:
,
11/16/1997 11:30, brian whatcott
Re: Ohne die Arbeit, part 3 (Long & wordy)
,
11/16/1997 13:12, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Forces:
,
11/16/1997 14:10, brian whatcott
2 forces ?
,
11/16/1997 16:53, Rick Stine
Re: HTML
,
11/16/1997 21:33, brian whatcott
Re: Red sprites
,
11/16/1997 21:37, brian whatcott
Re: Ohne die Arbeit, part 3 (Long & wordy)
,
11/16/1997 21:46, Bob Sciamanda
HTML
,
11/16/1997 21:57, Jim Green
Re: HTML
,
11/16/1997 22:00, Lowell Herr
Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/16/1997 22:10, Bill Cheesman
Re: HTML
,
11/16/1997 22:26, Robert Curtis
Re: HTML
,
11/16/1997 22:53, David Dockstader
Re: Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/16/1997 22:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: vortices in Kundt's tube
,
11/16/1997 23:02, David Dockstader
Re: RE Another student question
,
11/16/1997 23:05, David Dockstader
Re: Red sprites
,
11/16/1997 23:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/16/1997 23:33, brian whatcott
Re: vortices in Kundt's tube
,
11/16/1997 23:41, brian whatcott
Re: Help on Radius of Arc: Error
,
11/17/1997 00:03, brian whatcott
Re: Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/17/1997 02:18, Leigh Palmer
Red sprites
,
11/17/1997 04:13, JFDWG
Re: Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/17/1997 07:44, Bob Sciamanda
Re: HTML
,
11/17/1997 08:25, Richard W. Tarara
Re: vortices in Kundt's tube
,
11/17/1997 09:57, Michael Moloney
Re: HTML
,
11/17/1997 10:26, Dick Smith
Re: Red sprites
,
11/17/1997 10:54, Paul Camp
how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/17/1997 12:23, DSCHROEDER
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/17/1997 13:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: HTML
,
11/17/1997 14:00, John Gastineau
Re: Hardness/restitution
,
11/17/1997 14:37, SCIAMANDA
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/17/1997 14:41, DSCHROEDER
Re: HTML
,
11/17/1997 14:59, Jim Green
5 or More
,
11/17/1997 15:03, Jim Green
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/17/1997 15:13, Leigh Palmer
Re: Forces:
,
11/17/1997 15:45, James W. Wheeler
The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/17/1997 16:11, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: Tarski (complete and consistent?)
,
11/17/1997 16:42, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: Another student question
,
11/17/1997 16:58, Jim Riley
Re: Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/17/1997 17:39, Tom McCarthy
Re: HTML
,
11/17/1997 18:11, Margaret Mary Mazzolini
Re: Another student question
,
11/17/1997 18:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/17/1997 18:27, Margaret Mary Mazzolini
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/17/1997 18:47, DSCHROEDER
Re: Help on Radius of Arc
,
11/17/1997 18:49, brian whatcott
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/17/1997 19:06, Jim Green
Oops
,
11/17/1997 19:14, Jim Green
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/17/1997 20:16, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/17/1997 20:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: Hardness/restitution
,
11/17/1997 21:53, brian whatcott
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/17/1997 23:09, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: question on Bohr model
,
11/18/1997 07:07, Martha Takats
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/18/1997 08:30, herbgottlieb
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/18/1997 10:21, Rauber, Joel Phys
Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/18/1997 10:54, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Another student question
,
11/18/1997 11:34, Jon Bell
Re: Bohr Theory
,
11/18/1997 12:32, Jim Diamond
Interactive Physics problem.
,
11/18/1997 12:42, Charles Reno
Re: question on Bohr model
,
11/18/1997 12:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/18/1997 14:29, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Names of equinoxes and solstices
,
11/18/1997 15:11, John E. Sohl
Re: question on Bohr model
,
11/18/1997 15:12, Richard Grandy
Re: question on Bohr model
,
11/18/1997 15:14, Paul Camp
Solstice oops!!!
,
11/18/1997 15:14, John E. Sohl
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/18/1997 15:56, DSCHROEDER
Re: Another student question
,
11/18/1997 16:14, Jim Green
RE: Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/18/1997 16:57, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/18/1997 18:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/18/1997 18:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Induction and moving rod on a U-shaped conductor
,
11/18/1997 18:46, brian whatcott
Re: Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/18/1997 19:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: how many "forces" (or better, interactions)?
,
11/18/1997 19:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Induction and moving rod on a U-shaped conductor
,
11/18/1997 19:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Anti-matter questions (fwd)
,
11/18/1997 19:49, Delphi High School
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/18/1997 19:57, Lawrence L'Hote
Re: Anti-matter questions (fwd)
,
11/18/1997 20:13, Leigh Palmer
Re: Names of equinoxes and solstices
,
11/18/1997 20:23, Marlyn Jakub
That jerk again!
,
11/18/1997 20:28, Leigh Palmer
Origin of the dyne
,
11/18/1997 20:49, Lowell Herr
Non-tenure related positions in teaching and physics education
,
11/18/1997 20:49, David R. Sokoloff
Re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/18/1997 21:07, Donald E. Simanek
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/18/1997 21:07, Brad Shue
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/18/1997 22:34, Bob Sciamanda
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/18/1997 22:48, brian whatcott
Re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/18/1997 23:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/18/1997 23:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Induction and moving rod on a U-shaped conductor
,
11/18/1997 23:15, Bob Sciamanda
re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/18/1997 23:37, John Trammell
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/18/1997 23:52, brian whatcott
re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/19/1997 00:02, brian whatcott
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/19/1997 00:46, Bob Sciamanda
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 00:53, Bob Sciamanda
Induction and moving rod on a U-shaped conductor
,
11/19/1997 04:35, George Panagiotakopoulos
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 06:11, brian whatcott
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 06:20, brian whatcott
Re: Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/19/1997 07:25, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 07:51, George Spagna
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 08:45, David Bowman
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 09:10, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Anti-matter questions (fwd)
,
11/19/1997 09:47, Paul Camp
Re: Induction and moving rod on a U-shaped conductor
,
11/19/1997 09:53, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 09:55, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/19/1997 10:00, Paul Camp
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 10:11, GARY HEMMINGER
re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/19/1997 10:15, James W. Wheeler
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 10:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 10:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 10:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 10:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 10:48, Clarence Bennett
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 10:49, John Gastineau
Re: HTML
,
11/19/1997 11:46, PPARKER
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 11:47, PPARKER
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 11:54, John Gastineau
Re: Anti-matter questions (fwd)
,
11/19/1997 12:04, Maurice Barnhill
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 12:11, SCIAMANDA
Re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/19/1997 12:21, herbgottlieb
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 12:24, Sam Sampere
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 13:03, Doug Craigen
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 13:08, Mark Sylvester
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/19/1997 13:32, brian whatcott
Re: Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/19/1997 13:54, Paul Camp
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/19/1997 13:59, Paul Camp
Re: Stupid Question related to Bohr Theory
,
11/19/1997 14:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 16:47, Jim Riley
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 16:49, Jim Riley
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 17:01, Clarence Bennett
Re: Origin of the dyne
,
11/19/1997 17:04, Jim Green
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 18:00, John Mallinckrodt
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 18:41, Herb Schulz
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 19:43, brian whatcott
help with air friction?
,
11/19/1997 20:47, William Beaty
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/19/1997 20:59, Fred Lemmerhirt
Re: help with air friction?
,
11/19/1997 21:46, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: radiation vs. conduction
,
11/19/1997 21:57, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
radiation vs. conduction
,
11/19/1997 22:24, Timothy D. Wilson
Sci. Am. Frontiers
,
11/20/1997 00:08, William Beaty
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/20/1997 00:20, David Dockstader
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/20/1997 00:53, John Gastineau
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/20/1997 01:11, John Gastineau
Re: Anti-matter questions (fwd)
,
11/20/1997 03:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: That jerk again
,
11/20/1997 04:52, Martha Takats
Re: That jerk again!
,
11/20/1997 05:24, David Bowman
acceleration
,
11/20/1997 05:33, Harry L. Hightower
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/20/1997 05:37, Margaret Mary Mazzolini
Re: Sci. Am. Frontiers
,
11/20/1997 05:54, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: That jerk again
,
11/20/1997 07:02, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: help with air friction?
,
11/20/1997 08:26, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Sci. Am. Frontiers
,
11/20/1997 08:46, James W. Wheeler
Re: air resistance
,
11/20/1997 09:31, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/20/1997 09:49, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: help with air friction?
,
11/20/1997 11:31, John Mallinckrodt
Re: That jerk again
,
11/20/1997 12:28, SCIAMANDA
Re: help with air friction?
,
11/20/1997 12:38, Richard W. Tarara
TPT
,
11/20/1997 12:53, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: acceleration
,
11/20/1997 15:38, Donald E. Simanek
Re: help with air friction?
,
11/20/1997 15:58, Jim Green
re: acceleration, quiz bowl
,
11/20/1997 16:41, John Trammell
Re: Sci. Am. Frontiers
,
11/20/1997 16:43, Paul Camp
Re: acceleration
,
11/20/1997 17:15, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: acceleration
,
11/20/1997 19:10, John Mallinckrodt
Sans Work, Part 4 (finis), Long & Wordy
,
11/20/1997 21:58, Bob Sciamanda
Re: air resistance
,
11/20/1997 23:43, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/21/1997 09:32, Eugene P. Mosca
question from a colleague
,
11/21/1997 10:48, George Spagna
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/21/1997 11:32, PPARKER
Re: radiation vs. conduction
,
11/21/1997 12:50, Chuck Britton
Work Energy Theorems
,
11/21/1997 13:05, Al Bachman
Re: air resistance
,
11/21/1997 15:27, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: radiation vs. conduction
,
11/21/1997 15:31, Gary Karshner
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/21/1997 16:09, Rauber, Joel Phys
units
,
11/21/1997 17:02, Alex. F. Burr
Re: radiation vs. conduction: safety issue
,
11/21/1997 17:34, brian whatcott
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/21/1997 17:46, Thomas L Wayburn
Re: The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
11/22/1997 16:13, HERSCHEL NEUMANN
Graphical Calculator WWW Resc?
,
11/23/1997 22:22, Tony Wayne
Re: Graphical Calculator WWW Resc?
,
11/23/1997 22:52, brian whatcott
Re: Graphical Calculator WWW Resc?
,
11/24/1997 02:26, James Ealy
misconceptions tests
,
11/24/1997 06:20, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: Graphical Calculator WWW Resc?
,
11/24/1997 07:04, Mathieu Dubreuil
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/24/1997 10:23, mdittman
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/24/1997 10:25, hake
Re: Graphical Calculator WWW Resc?
,
11/24/1997 12:42, Timothy Usher
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/24/1997 13:08, brian whatcott
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/24/1997 13:51, Maurice Barnhill
Re: air resistance
,
11/25/1997 12:57, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/25/1997 14:14, Clarence Bennett
Re: air resistance
,
11/25/1997 16:17, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/25/1997 19:58, brian whatcott
Re: Are student evaluations useful?
,
11/25/1997 20:11, Jim Diamond
Re: air resistance
,
11/26/1997 09:05, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/26/1997 10:09, Thomas L Wayburn
Re[2]: piano tuning and the 256 Hz middle C
,
11/26/1997 11:29, Rick Strickert
book synopsis: Women's Ways of Knowing
,
11/26/1997 13:39, Jane Jackson
Re: book synopsis: Women's Ways of Knowing
,
11/26/1997 14:18, Joseph Bellina
Re: book synopsis: Women's Ways of Knowing
,
11/27/1997 08:48, brian whatcott
Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 10:00, Tom McCarthy
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 10:49, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 13:34, Doug Craigen
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 14:12, BRITTON
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/27/1997 14:39, Chuck Britton
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 15:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 15:54, Derek Chirnside
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/27/1997 16:02, Leigh Palmer
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 18:23, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/27/1997 19:13, Tom McCarthy
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/27/1997 19:20, Tom McCarthy
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/27/1997 23:19, David Dockstader
Inertia
,
11/27/1997 23:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/28/1997 00:28, Chuck Britton
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/28/1997 01:11, brian whatcott
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/28/1997 01:21, Leigh Palmer
Re: Inertia DEMO
,
11/28/1997 02:47, Derek Chirnside
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 08:24, Durig Lewis
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 08:53, Patrick Whippey
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 09:54, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 09:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 10:18, brian whatcott
Re: Inertia DEMO
,
11/28/1997 10:37, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Inertia and Lenz's Law
,
11/28/1997 10:47, George Spagna
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 11:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: optics/Japan (ii)
,
11/28/1997 11:38, brian whatcott
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 11:52, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 12:03, Donald E. Simanek
#2: Women's Ways of Knowing (synopsis)
,
11/28/1997 12:16, Jane Jackson
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 13:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 19:32, brian whatcott
Re: Inertia
,
11/28/1997 20:28, Leigh Palmer
A maximum possible acceleration ?
,
11/29/1997 08:51, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
e.m. waves from neutral particles ?
,
11/29/1997 08:55, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: A maximum possible acceleration ?
,
11/29/1997 10:50, brian whatcott
Re: e.m. waves from neutral particles ?
,
11/29/1997 11:09, Durig Lewis
Re: Inertia demos.
,
11/29/1997 11:40, Donald E. Simanek
Re: A maximum possible acceleration?
,
11/29/1997 11:59, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Le Chatelier --> INERTIA --> Lenz
,
11/29/1997 12:44, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Inertia demos.
,
11/29/1997 13:29, brian whatcott
Re: Inertia demos.
,
11/29/1997 14:47, Tom McCarthy
Re: air resistance
,
11/29/1997 14:55, John Mallinckrodt
Latest release of physics lab software
,
11/29/1997 15:00, Tim Sullivan x5830
Re: air resistance
,
11/29/1997 15:32, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Inertia demos.
,
11/29/1997 19:18, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Inertia demos.
,
11/29/1997 19:33, Newtons3rd
Re: air resistance
,
11/29/1997 19:42, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: A maximum possible acceleration?
,
11/29/1997 20:23, brian whatcott
A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/29/1997 20:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: air resistance
,
11/29/1997 21:06, John Mallinckrodt
Re: air resistance
,
11/29/1997 21:31, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
airbag safety
,
11/29/1997 23:37, JBRAUNSDORF
Re: A maximum acceleration ?
,
11/29/1997 23:46, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 00:05, Karl Trappe
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/30/1997 00:27, Karl Trappe
Re: Lenz's Law?
,
11/30/1997 01:58, Derek Chirnside
Re: A maximum acceleration ?
,
11/30/1997 02:30, brian whatcott
RE: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 02:40, Tim Sullivan x5830
RE: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 04:08, Margaret Mary Mazzolini
Re: Inertia Demos
,
11/30/1997 10:05, herbgottlieb
Re: A maximum acceleration
,
11/30/1997 11:52, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Inertia Demos
,
11/30/1997 11:57, brian whatcott
RE: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 12:09, brian whatcott
Testing Statistical Models
,
11/30/1997 13:02, brian whatcott
Re: A maximum acceleration ?
,
11/30/1997 13:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A maximum acceleration? (ii)
,
11/30/1997 13:29, brian whatcott
Re: optics/Japan
,
11/30/1997 13:43, David Dockstader
Re: A maximum acceleration ?
,
11/30/1997 13:58, brian whatcott
Re: optics/Japan (ii)
,
11/30/1997 14:30, David Dockstader
Re: A maximum acceleration ?
,
11/30/1997 15:00, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electric Breakdown
,
11/30/1997 15:15, Durig Lewis
Re: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 16:25, Raymond A. Rogoway
RE: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 16:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: A once in a lifetime opportunity
,
11/30/1997 19:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: INERTIA DEMO
,
11/30/1997 19:33, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: INERTIA DEMO
,
11/30/1997 21:30, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
The Tuned-Mass Damper
,
12/21/1997 21:50, Bob Sciamanda
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc