Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

RE: Models, etc.



At 09:09 10/30/97 -0600, Joel wrote:

As others have pointed out, if you are going to look at the transition from
rest to "falling" then you have to model the release as a continuous process
with a variable supporting force.
__________________________________________________________
I take exception to the accuracy of the last paragraph. I think the
discussion did not conclude that you *have* to model the release as a
continuous process. I think people were questioning whether modeling as a
discontinuous process was precisely 100% accurate or not. I don't even
think people questioned the discontinuous model as being all that bad
(others may disagree here). My guess is that one can model quite well,
under most typical circumstances, the motion of the object by a
discontinuous model. I admit you could probably cook up some set of
circumstances where the discontinuous model would break down; but that is a
far cry from saying that you *have* to model it as a discontinuous process.

Joel



A drop can be made rather quick e.g. by vaporizing a suspension wire.
People who need to model dynamic processes usually iterate with a
time period that is small in relation to the process under study.
I believe Joel would call this a discontinuous method.

The method is helpful because it can include all manner of non-linear
effects that classical mathematical analysis cannot address.

So if a suspension link blows in 2 microseconds, one could
model the process with 2 nanosecond steps if this were important.

Regards
brian whatcott <inet@intellisys.net>
Altus OK