Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
LUDWIK KOWALSKI wrote:Physics sciamanda@worldnet.att.net
. . . Once again it is a mattercan
of pedagogy, not physics. A caloric substance does not exist but we
pretend it does exist and solve many practical problems. Themagnetic
poles do not exist but we can pretend they do exist and understandmany
gadgets, such as dc motors and galvanometers.
We must present our subject in parables for the same reason that the
great
religious founders presented their subject in parables - neither
subject
is
literally explicable in human terms. "We see now darkly, as in a
mirror
..."
The sooner that both religion and science acknowledge the limited
"model" basis
of our understanding, the more tolerant and understanding we will all
become, and
the more useful will be our models.
--
Bob Sciamanda sciamanda@edinboro.edu
Dept of
Edinboro Univ ofPA http://www.edinboro.edu/~sciamanda/home.html
Edinboro, PA (814)838-7185Bravo!!!