Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
It seems to me that a sure way to lose an introductory class right atcarelessly split an infinitive.**** Students (in
the
start (especially a 'liberal arts' class) is to rigorously adhere to
metric/SI units when talking about everyday experiences. *** Or to
theWhat about 32.2 ft-poundmass/sec^2-poundforce = g sub c, which no one
U.S.) have no real feel for meters/second or Newtons, but do
understand
miles/hour and pounds. They can do kinematics calculations in their
head
if you use cars moving along the highway at familiar speeds and
distances
in their familiar 'miles'. One of the most memorable segments (for
students) of any film I've used over the years, is the Ring of Truth
(Change) episode where Morrison uses Jelly Donuts as a unit of energy
measure. Two years later, students still refer to that as the 'Jelly
Donut
film.'
The educational researchers keep telling us that we should work from
the
familiar towards the new so I wouldn't be so quick to discard feet,
miles,
hours, pounds or even 32 ft/s^2.
Rick
From: LUDWIK KOWALSKI <kowalskil@alpha.montclair.edu>is
The only number I would like to keep secret (responding to Santos)
32 ft/s^2. Conversions to SI? Yes. Doing physics with common units?No.