Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
In discussing these issues with students who know little about physics =
at all I am truly surprised at how much I myself have accepted to be =
true about the interpretation of QM without a deep understanding. I am =
consoled however by a quote from Feynman in his book "The Character of =
Physical Law", that basically says "....no one knows how it can be that =
way, it just is."
I agree that the Schrodingers Cat gedanken experiment could have been =
used to illustrate the seeming absurdity of the Copenhagen =
interpretation of QM. However it could also serve as a means to attempt =
to bring the odd properties of the QM world into a realm closer to our =
experience so that we might appreciate more the differences between the =
micro and macro worlds. In this sense it is in the spirit of Mr. =
Tompkins adventures, is it not?
As far as providing the students with alternatives, I did mention =
Everett's Many World's Interpretation. Amazingly, they were =
significantly more comfortable with this concept. Probably due to the =
fact that so much media SciFi plays on this idea. I did point out to =
them that if they recalled our discussion of the Scientific Method, that =
this theory was untenable due to it's untestability. The only truly =
different interpretation that I can think of is Bohm's Causal =
Interpretation which I understand to be most closely related to =
deBroglie's pilot wave theory.