This probably happened to many phys-L-ers. The content of my message is
shown below again. I want to count how many of us are actually active
(reading many messages from this list) and what is our geographical
distribution. At the same time I want to have data which will characterize
us on the basis of one particular thread. Please respnd to me personally,
not to PHYS-L.
Ludwik Kowalski kowalskiL@alpha.montclair.edu
************************************************************************
AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO TURN WORDS OF THIS PROBLEM
INTO A CUMULATIVE EXPRESSION? Please answer this question by writnig
to me personally. Choose one of the following options, for example,
write "Count me in the category B", I am from Australia".
Category A - I did solve this problem without any help
Category B - I did solve this problem after being helped
Category C - I am still trying
Category D - I tried but gave up
Category E - I saw the problem but was too busy to work on it
Category F - I missed this problem
Category G - I am a phys-Ler, but not in one of the above categories
I will destroy your input as soon as enter it into my count sheet
and will try not to remember your category. I will summarize the
result of counting in about a week or two.
ONCE AGAIN, THE CATEGORY ANSWER TO BE SENT TO ME, NOT TO PHYS-L
*************
(Why? Just imagin what happens when everybody sends a message to
everybody else on a large list.) The subject of your message should
be HEAD COUNT. Keep it short, just the category and the country (or
state).
Ludwik Kowalski kowalskiL@alpha.montclair.edu