Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: Calculus texts



Hi all-
I want to comment on two of Donald Simanek's remarks about my
posting under this subject heading. I will do so in two separate postings:
This is response posting 1 of 2.

In response to:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The end result is that the students, many of them deficient in algebra
skills, can "satisfactorily" complete a calculus course without understanding,
or even reading, any of the textual material. As for understanding any of
the underlying concepts - forget it!

The same criticism is applicable to most physics texts I've seen.

Students with such calculus preparation find themselves almost
totally lost when they enter our calculus-based physics classes. The
frustration with the math preparation of our students has been expressed
frequently on the physics-l net.
My solution to this problem is to write a "decent" introductory
calculus text. The text would adhere to the principles of:
a unifying theme
less is more
write at the level of the students' understanding
concept first, names later
avoid concepts that are unnecessary to the main theme
introduce concepts only as needed in the development of
main theme
continuous "circling back" and revisiting earlier concepts
including those learned in algebra and arithmetic
short, literate chapters, each dealing with a single principle
idea; each followed by relatively few exercises and problems.
The expectation is that a student will do all of the exercises
(and problems).

A very good list of qualities a text should have. With only slight
modification it could apply to physics texts as well.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Quite so. My list describes the plan of the text, "The Mechanical
Universe," the one by Olenick, et al., not the one by Frautschi, et al.
Regards,
Jack