Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Tony Arrott has proposed a subcritical assembly. ... I don't recall
exactly what he wanted to do with it, but his intention was not a power
production unit. Nothing will come of his proposal because any rumor of
its existence in the outside world would generate antagonism and incur
a political cost.
I am not convinced that vitrification and disposal of high level waste
is impractical. It may be politically infeasible, but that may change in
time. I do believe that storage is infeasible. If there is no clear
intent to reprocess the waste then I think it should be disposed of.
Are you convinced that anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for global
warming or are you, as I am, really just an advocate of nuclear power as
a sane alternative to fossil fuel and hydroelectric power generation?