Well, I took Jack U's advice and and went to the library and looked up the
topic of latitude for myself in various references and learned a few things.
(Thanks Jack for the reminder about proper research procedure.) The results
Def. #1: tilt angle of the local horizontal w.r.t. analogous plane on equator
Def. #2: central angle at Earth's center between the location and the equator
Lerner & Trigg, _Encyclopedia_of _Physics_, VCH, (1991): No entry for latitude
_International_Dictionary_of_Geophysics_Vol._2_, (1967): The jackpot! 4 defs.
1. geographic latitude= def. #1
2. geocentric latitude= def. #2
(Apparently seismologists used geographic latitude in calculating
epicentral distances until 1936 at which time they switched to geocentric
3. astronomical latitude= a particular refined version of def. #2 such that
the angular momentum vector of the Earth's rotation (rather than its
angular velocity vector) defines the polar axis and the equator is defined
such that the local geoid (local horizontal plane) is parallel to this
axis. The astronomical latitude is the tilt angle of the geoid w.r.t. the
rotational angular momentum vector.
4. geodetic latitude= same as astronomical latitude except that the Earth's
best fit spheriodal surface is used rather than the local geoid to
determine the local horizontal. Essentially, the geodetic latitude throws
away perturbations in the Earth's gravitational field due to all mass
multipole moments beyond the quadrupole.
Definition 3 above is called "astronomical" because it defines the direction
of the celestial poles and the celestial equator on the celestial sphere as
well as the Declination coordinate of each of the heavenly bodies on the
celestial sphere. The angular momentum vector defines the celestial polar
direction as it is less subject to the wobbling that accompanies the angular
velocity vector omega as the earth rotates due to the Earth's inertia tensor
being ansiotropic and the angular momentum not being exactly along one of the
principal axis directions. Over time the North Pole defined by the angular
velocity vector (NPAV) wanders around w.r.t. and near the North Pole defined
by the angular momentum vector (NPAM). This wandering has components with two
different periods. There is the part with a 14 month period which is a
precession coming from the solution of Euler's equations for a freely rotating
rigid body whose angular momentum is not along a principal axis of its inertia
tensor. There is also a part with a seasonal 12 month period due to seasonal
changes in the Earth's inertia tensor caused by redistributions of air, ice,
and snow through out the year. The combined effect of these two components
causes the NPAV to wander around w.r.t. the NPAM with a typical displacement
of about 10 m between them. The NPAM itself also wanders around w.r.t.
perpendicular to the Earth's orbital plane (ecliptic) with a precession period
of about 25 kyr, and on top of this precession is a nutation whose period is
about 41 kyr due to gravitational couplings between the Earth's mass
quadrupole moment and the Sun and the Moon.
Unfortunately, none of all this interesting information has answered my
original question which was which definition of latitude is used by
cartographers in making detailed maps. Also I would like to know which
definition is used by surveyors in determining geopolitical boundaries. (It
seems obvious that the cartographers would use whichever definition that the
surveyors use.) The DMZ between North and South Korea is bisected by the 38th
parallel according to which definition? The 38th parallel of geocentric
latitude should differ by about 18 km from the geographic/astronomical/
geodetic version. A bigger discrepancy would occur between the two versions
of the 49th parallel which separates Canada from the United States along most
of the border.